Archive Entertainment Bug Database
March of Industry
Go to the previous open issue
Go to the previous issue (open or closed)
star_faded.png
Please log in to bookmark issues
/files/show/4 March of Industry / Closed Bug report #17 Box Loader/Unloader usage can be a full 3x3 area. Ver. Alpha .1836
action_vote_minus_faded.png
0
Votes
action_vote_plus_faded.png
Go to the next issue (open or closed)
Go to the next open issue
This issue has been closed with status "Not a bug" and resolution "WON'T FIX".
icon_important.png The project this issue belongs to has been archived, and so this issue is now read only
Issue basics
  • Type of issue
    Bug report
  • Category
    Not determined
  • Targetted for
    Not determined
  • Status
    Not a bug
  • Progress
  • Priority
    Not determined
User pain
  • Type of bug
    Not triaged
  • Likelihood
    Not triaged
  • Effect
    Not triaged
Affected by this issue (0)
There are no items
People involved
Times and dates
  • Posted at
  • Last updated
  • Estimated time
    Not estimated
  • Time spent
    No time spent
    Click here to see time logged against this issue
Issue details
  • Resolution
    WON'T FIX
  • Reproducability
    Not determined
  • Severity
    Not determined
Attachments (0)
There is nothing attached to this issue
Duplicate issues (0)
This issue does not have any duplicates
Description

The Action with sand, tin, copper, and so forth boxes was able to lay a 3x3 set of boxes around and on top of a box unloader. repeated experiment with empty boxes and all 3x3 were able to be placed. The Reaction the unloader took materials from the boxes in the 3x3 area. the loader was able to put the materials into the boxes in the 3x3 area - since boxes are 'incorporeal'(like most build-able items in the game), items can go through them with enough speed to reach the loader.

Why do I consider it a bug? I consider it a bug because if you are trying to save space by placing unloaders one above another facing the same direction, thus placing different boxes above each other, does not guarantee the unloader will grab from the correct adjacent box. This can lead to production problems if you are trying to minimize the amount of area you use for production. Equally, the issue also persists with loaders in a similar way. Two adjacent loaders facing the same direction with empty boxes around them will not necessarily direct materials to the desired boxes.

I tried different patterns for the boxes, and the only conclusion I could come to was that the priority for loading/unloading from boxes is not a 'always takes from/puts in box X first' pattern.

Steps to reproduce this issue

For the 3x3 Experiment:

  1. Build a box loader or unloader

  2. With the box loader or ubloader at the center (Z), place full or empty boxes at each of the surrounding eight spots (W) WWW WZW WWW

  3. Finally, place a full or empty box on the loader or unloader as appropriate. For the unloader, it will automatically unload each box, for the loader you will have to put loadable objects near the machine or 'launch' them to the machine.

For the Production Experiment:

  1. I set up the following: S=Sand Box, I=Iron Box, E=Empty Box, C=Conveyor Belt, P= Production Machine (Single Material), L=Loader, U=Unloader. S EEE SUCPCLE IUCPCLE I EEE

  2. The non-pattern can be shown without the production machine as well: T=Tin, M=Copper. ITM EEE SUCCCLE MUCCCLE SIT EEE

Good Luck!

Todos (0 / 0)
Issue created